Why Never Let Me Go will one day be regarded as the masterpiece it is!
Part 1 Hailsham
It was a bright, sunny day in early September, 2010. I was in the Thousand
Oaks, CA area and picked up an LA Times and much to my amazement a film was
already being offered for Guild members (I've been a WGAw member since '06) to
see gratis, Never Let Me Go, Monday-Thursday. It was a film I was vaguely aware
of, knew it was director Mark Romanek's sophomore effort, but not much else. I
was aware the book was a well known, best seller, but again, not much else. And
this may be a critical aspect to the full appreciation of this film. Do yourself
a favor if you have not seen the film (there are, after all, quite a few of you
sadly), nor read the book... Stop reading now! No, really. Stop... Reading...
NOW and go watch the film!!! If you're one of those lucky few who have no prior
knowledge, no pre-conceptions, as it should be by the way, you're in for a real
cinematic treat.
The film unfurls with some very small super imposed title (SUPERTITLE as we
scribblers call it) text stating: "The breakthrough in science came in 1952.
Doctors could now cure the previously incurable. By 1967, life expectancy passed
100 years." Hmmm, very clearly an alternate reality this film is setting up for
us, the viewer. Now, this is a very simple, but hugely important point that's
been made clear for us right away. This is a very technically advanced society
our characters reside in. I will make an important point on this later to
address some very superficial, and quite frankly knuckle headed, criticisms I'd
read about the film. File this factoid away.
In the opening shot, we fade into a view of a silhouette of a women looking
into an operating room. Then cut to a shot of her looking into the o.r. we
see a young man being wheeled in. In voiceover, the women identifies herself as
Kathy H, a very good 'carer', which is unclear exactly what that is, we can
assume a sort of nurse like position given the setting. (She's played with
understated brilliance by Carey Mulligan.) The young man is Tommy (also
brilliantly portrayed by Andrew Garfield.) And another character is mentioned,
Ruth, whom we haven't seen yet. Again, the beauty of knowing nothing about the
material, we have no idea of the gravity of what we're seeing. The voiceover
helps transition us back to the main characters childhood as we see what looks
to be a boarding school, Hailsham 1978, we're told in the lower caption, (More
on the year 1978 later.) Various shots of young children set the environment as
the school headmistress, Charlotte Rampling who channels some the chilly
austerity she conveyed as Paul Newman's girlfriend in The Verdict, addresses the
assembly. In our first 'tell' or clue something is slightly amiss, she seems
unusually perplexed that, "three burned cigarettes" had been found on the
grounds and while the young charges may see others smoke, they are
special. "Students of Hailsham must keep themselves well and healthy 'inside'
and is of paramount importance," states Miss Emily (Rampling.) Well, fair
enough, the kids shouldn't be smoking, but it's stated in an ominous and a bit
unnecessarily alarming tone.
As this segment proceeds we're introduced to young Kathy, Tommy, and Ruth
played by Izzy Meikle-Small, Charlie Rowe, and Ella Purnell
respectively. They do fairly normal kid stuff like play soccer, go to art class,
talk about boys (Ruth and Kathy) etc. A new teacher at Hailsham (Miss Lucy
played by Sally Hawkins) observes the kids playing. A ball goes toward a fence,
young Tommy, full of vigor like an overzealous puppy, suddenly stops. He dare
not cross that boundary. Miss Lucy asks some of the girls why Tommy didn't get
the ball. She's regaled by the youngsters of horrific tales of mutilation and
starvation to those who ran afoul of the Hailsham grounds in the past. When Miss
Lucy inquires as to the veracity of these tales, young Ruth responds matter of
factly, "who'd make up stories as horrible as that?" Indeed, who would make up
stories like WMD leading the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people?
Who would make up stories about mortgage backed securities being great
investments, sell them to pension funds, then short them at the same time? Who?
We see very early on, that the people we go on this journey with are very sweet,
decent, and incredibly humane. We get a few more strange 'tells' on the way:
Kathy H acquires a small bruise on her cheek that elicits an inordinate amount
of attention. (She got it trying to console poor Tommy, whom she's developed a
crush on, all wound up on in knots after being the subject of repeated teasing.
He inadvertently slaps her, but whole heartedly apologizes later.) Outsiders who
come to the boarding school treat the children a bit strangely. In one instance
a woman, simply known as 'Madame' from "the gallery" (where the youngsters get
to have their art and drawings on display) acts as though she's ready to be
mugged on the subway to 130th Street and Lennox Ave. (Harlem in case you didn't know) when she simply crosses
the path of a few young Hailsham girls. (This scene may have been a bit much, by
the way.) We see the kids have bracelets in which they have to scan as they
leave the building to go and play. More on this later. A delivery man regards
the cute little girls in a somewhat odd fashion. He's bringing a 'bumper crop'
of goodies and knick knacks as a way to reward the children for good behavior
and keep their spirits up. Hmm, opiate of the masses as Marx would've said:
American Idol, football, Kate Perry anyone?
The film derives it's title from a song on a cassette tape Tommy gives to
Kathy as she's seemingly uninterested in the 'bumper crop' offering. The two
are starting to become close, and in a kind of adorable, but what turns out to
be foreboding, scene Kathy cradles a pillow as she listens to the song. Probably
imagining it's Tommy. Not long after she does so, she becomes vaguely aware of
Ruth's presence in the hallway, vicariously peering in. The next scene,
beginning with a wide exterior shot of Hailsham in the rain, a wilting flower in
the window, we get the big reveal! Again, if you know nothing of the narrative
please stop reading... No really, just stop, and go watch the film, then revisit
us. We'll still be here, I promise. Anyhow, it is in the classroom that Miss
Lucy gives her students, our three main characters, and by extension, us, the
audience, the big reveal. In essence, these young folks have been 'created'
(through genetic cloning as we deduce as the narrative continues) to donate
their vital organs, some three or four donations, before they 'complete' (that
hateful word that will be uttered many more times throughout the film) their
young lives. They will never be actors, or teachers, or 'visit America'. "You
must know who and what you are in order to lead good and productive lives", says
Miss Lucy in a reluctant and emotional fashion. The kids are somewhat startled
by this grim revelation, the camera hangs on Ruth a beat longer than the rest as
she seems particularly upset by this. As Miss Lucy looks at the window to the
rain, a gust of wind blows some papers from her desk to the floor. In another
very kind and humane gesture, Tommy shakes off the shock of this reveal to
pick up the scattered papers and place them back on the desk. What we discover
throughout the film is these 'clones' if you will, considered sub-human by the
'normal' folks they serve, are more loving, caring, and tenderly human than
their counterparts. Even though Ruth (played as an adult very skillfully by
Keira Knightly) will go on to tests the bounds of this humanity through selfish,
but understandable, behavior. Her mates Kathy and Tommy ultimately forgive her
and still love her. And indeed Ruth makes amends to the two as best she can
before she 'completes'.
We could stop here and analyze the wisdom of Miss Lucy leveling with
children, tantamount to telling the kids there's no Santa Clause. It seems maybe
a bit cruel and unnecessary, possibly it is best to let the illusion persist
until the children grow up. as the headmistress seems to indicate as she lets
the children know in the morning assembly Miss Lucy has been let go, no longer
to teach there. "There are those who seek to impede progress," Miss Emily says.
What I love about this film is it provides no easy answers. These people, all of
them, human or clone, are doing the best they can. Much like life itself, we
play the cards we're dealt as well as we can. Soon after this, Ruth starts to
take a much more enthusiastic interest in Tommy. At various points Kathy sees
the two holding hands, and later kissing. It should be said Tommy's character is
not exactly a dim bulb, but rather a tad awkward, unsure of himself, unable to
articulate his inner life if you will. Susceptible to manipulation as Ruth
discovers. The puppy metaphor is a good one: boundless energy and heart. Ruth is
probably the most fragile, sensitive, and 'weakest' of the trio. Kathy by far,
the strongest, the leader, the Alpha. This dynamic between the trio will
permeate the rest of the film.
Now's as good a time as any to discuss the director, Mark Romanek's, style
and oeuvre. One need look no further than his first film, One Hour Photo, to
conclude he's a Kubrick fan. Many of the slow zoom shots on Robin Williams
reminiscent of Barry Lyndon and especially The Shining. While I thought the film
was very well done, nothing in it indicated the utter brilliant, mastery of the
medium Romanek puts on display here. Obviously, coming from the world of
commercials and music videos, one would expect a well shot, well edited and
designed, technically proficient film. However, this is the work of a fully
mature artist. The sensibility, sensitivity, and aesthetic choices here are
perfect across the board. Clearly, the subject matter would indicate
a technically advanced, futuristic society, but rather than fall into the usual
sci-fi visual cues Romanek opts for a radically different approach. This is an
alternate reality, focus on reality. If it were set in the typical dystopian
future, the viewer could just easily dismiss it as, "oh well, that's way in the
future." Instead, this is here and now. This looks like a reality we know and
understand, a world WE live in. This makes it all the more unsettling. As
mentioned, every aspect of the film contains impeccable craftsman ship: script,
performances, cinematography, production design, editing, and maybe most
importantly the score. Rachel Portman's music maybe be the best film composition
since Bernard Herrman's score for Vertigo. I'm usually resistant to a score that
tyrannizes the narrative, guiding us through what to feel and think. Simply,
most film scores of the last few decades. For instance, in a film like Michael Mann's The Insider, much of the score is overbearing, hampering the power of what's on screen. In another Mann masterpiece, Manhunter, some of the Shreikback songs impossibly date the film to the Eighties. Never Let Me Go is a completely different animal.
It does what all great film scores do, it compliments the visual experience,
enhances it, imbues itself in the film's DNA so you can't possibly imagine the
film without it. And, that's exactly what we have here.
Maybe another way in which Romanek channels Stanley Kubrick. After all, who
can imagine 2001's space scenes without Strauss' "Blue Danube" or A Clockwork
Orange without "Singin' in the Rain." While there are no overt nods to Kubrick
here, certain scenes evoke some of his work. In one scene, when Kathy spies
Tommy and Ruth having a first kiss, it reminds one of Ryan O'Neill and one of
his conquests in Barry Lyndon. Another, a transitional scene where Kathy is
packing some of her belongings into a little suitcase: her cassette tape from
Tommy, a little Unicorn-like plaything from Ruth. (A nod to Blade Runner?) In
voiceover, she explains they've grown up and are moving out of Hailsham. We see
her hand fondling the various trinkets, then cut to a wider shot of Kathy H. as
a young woman, not unlike the transition from a large bone used as a weapon to a
satellite orbiting space in 2001. This brings us to the next sequence, entitled
The Cottages...
No comments:
Post a Comment